When he won the Oscar for 'Training Day', Denzel Washington proved to all that he indeed can play the bad guy and be convincing at it. That being said, not long after that, he went back to playing detective and government roles such as in 'Deja Vu' and 'Inside Man'. Meanwhile, Russell Crowe has always been presented himself to have a tough persona on the big screen. From 'Romper Stomper' to 'L.A Confidential' to 'Gladiator' to this year's '3:10 to Yuma', his characters are men who are not to be reckon with.

So what do you get when you're able to get the two of them in the same film playing against type and up against each other - 'American Gangster'.

Directed by Ridley Scott, "American Gangster" concerns Harlem drug kingpin Frank Lucas (Washington), who smuggled heroin in the body bags of U.S. soldiers slain in Vietnam. Josh Brolin plays Det. Trupo, a crooked NYPD cop who piggybacks on the Lucas investigation conducted by Det. Ritchie Roberts (Crowe). When it all came downhill, it was Lucas who ended up working with Roberts to put away many of New York's notorious gangsters. Also in the are Josh Brolin, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Carla Gugino, Ruby Dee, Common, TI, RZA, Ted Levine, John Ortiz, Yul Vazquez, Idris Elba, and Cuba Gooding Jr.

At a recent press conference, both Washington and Crowe talked about the roles they played and the era of drugs that made New York a dangerous place to live in.

Can you talk about the delicate balance between good versus evil that we see so clearly between your two characters?

Denzel Washington: Now, who was the good guy and who was the evil guy? That's the delicate balance.

One could say that the cord runs parallel to both.

DW: And there you have it. The cord runs parallel to both. Jump in there, Russell.

Russell Crowe: Well, I think that's one of the fascinating things about the two characters and about the story itself. That none of that's clear. There's not a clear singular morality, and when you get the opportunity to play that sort of thing, which is nothing more than reality and the sort of humanity as it exists. It's just a bit of fun. Richie's an honest guy and all that sort of thing, but as his wife calls him out in the court: you're only honest in one area; you try and buy yourself favorites for all the shit that you do. I just think that's an honest appraisal of who he was as a man at that time, but it also leaks into that area of discussing why people go bad in the first place, or what the process of Frank Lucas was to become a drug dealer. If Frank Lucas had been befriended by somebody else and educated in a different area, he might get in a situation where a university's named after him. He's a very smart guy and he uses things that he's learned to the best of his ability to change his life and change the life of his family at that time. But it just happened to be that Bumpy Johnson was his teacher. We were joking yesterday about doing his sort of course work on the street, PhD in criminality under Bumpy Johnson.

Denzel, there are a few rappers in this movie and I was wondering about your reaction about a rapper making a gangster album and a actor making a gangster movie? Over the past year, guys like Al Sharpton and Oprah have been going against violence in hip hop album and different language, so the rappers get a certain rep, but in gangster movies, the actors are praised. How was wondering if you had an opinion on why there's a difference?

DW: In 2005, I did "Julius Caesar," so whenever any rapper's ready to do some Shakespeare, I'll be there. I can do both. So can they, if they can. So there is a difference. This is just one movie. It's not the only movie I've made. I'm not knocking rappers but...

RC: I think what he was actually getting to, which is really pretty cool, is that he's saying that a guy comes out and he sings a song about his lot as a gangster or what his experience was. He puts it on a record, and people get down on him, but you and me, we make a movie about you being a gangster, and us in that world, and we get praised for it, in terms of, from a creative point of view.

DW: Yeah, some rappers who have made gangster albums have gotten praise for it, too. Some real good ones. Real good ones. "America's Most Wanted" is still one of my favorite albums.

RC: Is it the criminality that people are getting upset about with the music or is it the sort of male-female attitude kind of thing? I mean there's some of that sort of stuff, and you know you're actually literally singing the praises of gun worship, as opposed to a movie that plays out in front of you and a story that's being told. This is how something actually really happened.

DW: And these are the consequences.

RC: There's definitely a difference there.

The film takes place during the Vietnam war and we are living during the Iraqi war. What is your take of the moving or transportation of drugs and the revenue and the gangsters in society today compare to back then?

DW: Who is the new American gangster? Oh man. They get voted in now. Next question.

There's a strong tradition of New York crime films from "Naked City" to "The Godfather" and "Prince of the City." Where do you think "American Gangster" fits into that lineage?

DW: Well, I can say for one, of all those films you mentioned, there's no black people in any of them. So for one, this is a Harlem story. This is about a guy who was a kingpin, about a different kingpin. I think the situation is basically the same. They were obviously different movies, but the business was the same, if it was based on the heroin business. As we were talking earlier, I guess to a degree, it's a genre. There are certain things that are similar in those kinds of films, but this one in particular, dealing with a guy from uptown.

Denzel, Ridley (Scott) said that Frank (Lucas) is a very disturbed man and that he was on the set all the time and he said he would describe him as a sociopath. Can you talk about your interpretation of him? Is there something missing there?

DW: Sociopath. I wouldn't say that about Frank. I didn't find that to be true. I think that as Russell was saying earlier, he's a man without a formal education, he's a man who at the age of 6 witnessed his cousin get murdered by sociopaths.

RC: In uniform.

DW: In uniform. Elected officials. And that changed his life. From a very young age he began to steal and he worked his way up the line. He came to New York and the most notorious gangster in Harlem recognized the talent, if you will, in this young kid, and he continued to train him. He was on the wrong side of the tracks, but he was a brilliant student, and became a master of the business that he was in. It's a dirty business. And he's definitely a criminal. He's responsible for the death of many people. So I don't want to just say that he's a product of his environment, but I guess to a degree we all are, and as Russell said, I think had he got a formal education, had he gone in another direction, had he had different influences, I think he still would have been a leader or a very successful man. You know he has a 10 or 12-year-old son now who's brilliant.

But doesn't the film glamorize him?

RC: That's a sort of easy one to take head-on because quite frankly, large parts of Frank Lucas's life were very glamorous. The nightclubs, hanging out with Wilt Chamberlain, sports figures and celebrities of the time. His public persona as such was the guy that ran this nightclub. Everything else that fell down from that was not known. Wilt Chamberlain or any of these celebrities that were hanging out with him wouldn't have known that Frank was turning over a couple of hundred keys every month in heroin, you know what I mean?

DW: And they may have known that he still had the club where the chicks were.

Both of you gentlemen have gotten so many accolades for your work. What inspires you to get up every day and do the work you do?

DW: That was a good question. Professionally now, I've sort of started to head in another direction. Getting behind the camera, the second film I've directed now, and I'm sure that's my new career, but on a more basic level, I was just watching Russell with his little boy up front and that's part of the reason. I had to go to work so we could eat, but there's a lot of joy in that, just watching his face, playing with his son and his son just looking at his dad. Acting for me is making a living, it's not my life. My children and my family, that's life. The miracle of life. I'll get up every morning, God willing, for that.

RC: I've always seen it to be a privilege to make movies. It's a really expensive, creative medium and people around me to do it. There's things that I can do as an actor that I couldn't do in any other form of life, and I've got a strange personality, but film requires strange people, so I've got a nice comfy home. That's what I do and I'm really happy with that. And when I know I'm getting up to go to work with Ridley and I know the time and effort he would have put into whatever it is that we're about to shoot that day, it's all, to me it's just a great privilege, and every day I kind of look around and thank the lord that it's still going on, and I just get to work and do the thing I'm doing that day.

Denzel, as a New Yorker, were you familiar with the story of Bumpy Johnson and Nicky Barnes? Did you learn anything while and after playing this character?

DW: Yeah, I think everybody heard about Nicky Barnes, and again it's a testament to Frank's business sense. You never heard about Frank Lucas. Nicky Barnes bought his dope from Frank Lucas, a lot of it. Some people were more interested in being in front of the camera and some more in just being behind, and Frank was many layers removed from the streets.

Denzel, were you at all hesitant about playing another dark character after 'Training Day'? Did you think how you were going to flip the script with the next character?

DW: I wasn't hesitant at all. A good story is a good story. I just think again that before "Training Day," I hadn't really been offered that kind of role. After "Training Day," that was all I was offered. No, that's not true, but I was offered more of that kind of thing, but it just comes down to good material, great actor to work with and great filmmaker. It wasn't that complicated, at all. 'Great Debaters' is an entire different story. We tested the film up in the Bay Area last week, and it tested through the roof. People loved it and it had a great ovation at the end of the film. It's a wonderful film for great young actors like Nate Parker and Jurnee Smollett and a young man named Denzel Whitaker, if you can believe that, and Jermaine Williams and they all give brilliant performances and Forrest Whitaker and myself are in the film as well. So I'm very happy about that film. It's a completely different film from this and I'm proud of it.

Crime is supposedly down in New York, but this was definitely a period of corruption in terms of the police and gangster of the day. What were your insights to the gangster and police of that era? Did you do any research and do think things have changed or not.

DW: Okay, I'll go first. Maybe it's cliché, but I think there was more honor among thieves in those days. There was a sort of code of ethics. We didn't hear about Frank killing kids and that kind of thing, and drive-bys and all of that. He's a very interesting man. He was very much a family man, and believed in sitting down at Thanksgiving with the family and all of that. He was in the drug business. I don't think he looked at himself as a killer or even a criminal. He was in a business, he sold the product, and he did a good job at it.

RC: I don't think anybody wants zealotry in their police force. There's always got to be room for what you might call benign corruption. Nobody blames a man who steals food to feed his starving children, but on the other hand somebody who picks up a badge and takes an oath to serve and protect, we do expect a certain level level of essential honesty. I mean you're going to be put in situations as a policeman that require you to function and observe without necessarily getting involved, and taking the money from drug operations and all that sort of stuff is something that goes past what most of us in society would expect a policeman should do. And the particular time we're talking about, and this has happened in most countries around the world, most western countries where drugs just suddenly became a gigantic thing, and suddenly the money you're talking about wasn't small, it was gigantic, and you went from talking in terms of tens of thousands to hundreds of millions. That temptation hits the police force at the same time as the temptation to take those drugs that are readily available hits the people on the streets. So no doubt, there is always going to be that kind of situation where that happened, where the money was just too strong and greed overtook a lot of people. But that's one of the by products of Frank Lucas's life, that we've got to look at as well. A lot of stuff got cleaned up because of Frank Lucas. Frank Lucas turned state's evidence and 75% of the people in the Special Investigations Unit got busted, because they were on the take. I think that therein is the key for the friendship that still existed between Richie and Frank. They did a thing together post Frank's arrest which bonded them together as men and that bond still exists today.

AMERICAN GANGSTER opens on November 2, 2007.