After all the hype and magazine covers and endless talk amongst teens, the vampire flick 'Twilight' is finally in theaters.
Is it worth seeing?
Is it any good?
Does it matter what's written or said?
The answer is no to all, but it certainly leaves room for improvement.
Faithful fans of the book will no doubt will propel this film to be a blockbuster.
As for its lead star, Robert Pattinson, he's the closest thing to a rock star in this film as if Dracula gave him the lyrics to lure women to his charm without singing a note.
It's the conventional boy-meets-girl, boy-loses-girl, boy-gets-girl story but with a bloodthirsty spin.
Isabella 'Bella' Swan (Kristen Stewart) is the new kid in town and everyone knows it. So much that she's the potential subject for the school paper. When she nixes that, she gets acquainted with some of the students who fill her in as to who's who in the school. When having lunch at the cafeteria, she's told about the elite Cullen family, and meets Edward Cullen (Pattinson), the good looking one who keeps to himself and speaks to no one but his family.
As shy as Bella is, she can't help herself in trying to communicate with Edward, until he reluctantly talks back. She's further intrigued when circumstances forces Edward to reveal himself as to who he is; and rather than run and be spooked, she's hooked and unafraid. Little does she know the dangers that come with this family and when evil doers (Cam Gigandet, Rachelle Lefevre, and Edi Gathegi) show up to do more harm than good, she has to decide whether she stays with Edward or move on.
With HBO's True Blood and the foreign film 'Let The Right One In', getting involved with a vampire is suddenly a cool thing. In a year of 'change', bloodsucking is in; but Melissa Rosenberg's script doesn't give any depth to the characters.
The tone of the film is very campy. It has the feel of a pilot episode for a TV show, like an updated 'Dark Shadows'. If you haven't read any of Stephanie Meyer's books, then seeing the film will not inspire to you to go out and buy the entire collection.
For all the good work Catherine Hardwicke did with her two previous films, 'Thirteen' and the biblical film 'The Nativity Story', helming this film is a step backwards. She window dressed it with rock music, wonderful cinematography and design, but little substance.
The redeeming factor in the film comes towards the end when once all of the principals have been identified and the love story becomes acceptable, a rivalry develops between families, much like the 'Underworld' films. If financially successful at the box office, Hardwicke can redeem herself by injecting some substance into the sequel and the story can unfold to what fans and newcomers can appreciate.


Comments: (17)
Add a comment
By: monlop4 on 12/30/2008 10:55AM
I have read the movies and although I thought the movie was good, I think that the books are so much better. I think that there were alot of key scenes in the book that were left out that could of made the movie 10x better, especially the romantic scenes. Overall movie was good
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: lisa on 12/30/2008 10:22PM
The movie was horrible! The book is amazing! The only thing the movie got right was casting Edward! The other acting was like watching a highschool plays rendition of the book, blah! Hopefully with a new director the next movie will do the book justice.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Mary on 1/21/2009 4:00PM
I didn't love the movie, I love the books though. I think the movie was a casting of ugly teenagers who I never want to see ever again, maybe they did this so the vamps looked outstandingly appealling, but anyway Bella in the film needs acting lessons ASAP, the role came in too heavy for her, and as far as Pattison, I LOVED him!!!
Jacob on the other hand looks like an appalachian more than a warewolf, I kept having the feeling that we was going to start a fire and dance around it at any minute!!! (LOL) Ugly teenage casting I tell you, where in the world are nice looking people when you want to make a movie of a so very romantic movie. Also I was sorry they cut on the romantic scenes, I love the dinamic in the books, and I didn't quite see it in the movie.
My advice? Toss Jacob, Eric (EWWWW!!!), Angela, and all the other ugly people in the cast and get good looking people, what ever happened to Hollywood standards really!!!!!!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Tina on 1/04/2009 5:40PM
I am 40+ and I do not like scary movies at all! I almost passed on this movie. It would have been a mistake. I loved it! I had never heard of the books or Stephenie Meyer. Now I am very familiar with the books and her work. I have completed the first two 'Twilight' books and anxiously await (by mail) the last two books. There are some distinct differences that really do not matter to mention. Don't hate, congratulate!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: tania on 1/11/2009 7:58PM
I saw it yesterday. Cute little movie. Wont be the next titanic.Not worth all the hype it got but not bad As you say in your critique lacks substance. It lacks the chemistry, emotionality and tragedy that a real great movie must have
its a good teenage flick. Reminded me of my long gone high school years. However, I wonder if it will connect to younger or older audiences.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: tania on 1/11/2009 8:01PM
thanks for the objective review
Tania
http://telemundo33.wordpress.com/
www.telemundo33.com
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Gary Vell on 1/14/2009 10:31PM
Download Twilight the Complete Movie here:
http://elfurl.com/lepdu
Reply to this Comment | Report This