
When one waits as long as Baz Luhrmann has to make a film, you tend to think that he's creating a masterpiece. After all, it's been seven long years since he directed his last film, 'Moulin Rouge!'.
With his current muse (Nicole Kidman) back in his latest film, 'Australia', he was hoping to regain the same respect and applause he had received before, but unfortunately, his time away from the game hasn't sharpened his skills. 'Australia' is a big, overlong drama that needed more substance than glossy makeup and hokey acting.
Fellow Aussies Nicole Kidman and Hugh Jackman are certainly attractive and appealing enough to bring in an audience to this nearly three hour film, but too many cartoonish scenes saddles what could have a great epic and romantic film. The one saving grace in the film is newcomer Brandon Walters. The kid innocently shines throughout the film.
Starting out from England, aristocrat Lady Sarah Ashley (Kidman) sets out to Australia to find her husband, whom she assumes is having an affair, but then finds out he was murdered. With a huge family ranch named Faraway Downs untended, she looks to hire the best man to tend to the cattle to keep business afloat. When local businessman King Carney (Bryan Brown), who practices run the entire area, threatens to tear down her business with the help of his future son-in-law Neil Fletcher (David Wenham), who was fired by Ashley for running unfair 'labor' practices, ranch hand Drover (Jackman) comes to the rescue.
As Drover now leads the charge, the heaviest task is moving a large amount of cattle across the Australia's brutal landscape, which gains Sarah respect amongst the locals. Meanwhile, an Aboriginal child named Nullah (Walters), who lost his mother while trying to save him from the authorities because he's of mixed race, needs to be taken care of and while reluctant to do so at first, Sarah's latent maternal instincts kick in. As Nullah yearns for stability, he also must, according to his culture, go 'walkabout' with his grandfather, which doesn't suit Sarah well. When the war nears Darwin, Australia after the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, all lives are at stake as a deadly fate awaits them.
Initially cartoonish at the beginning with weak introductions and slapstick humor, but given enough time, especially with this one, Luhrmann slowly worked his magic to what he knows best. What's worked for most of his films is the style of garish colors he employs around the film. Everything looks gorgeous, but somewhere in the middle, he lost direction of the film. One minute it's romantic, then it's about saving the kid, and finally politics come into play. Never mind the endless use of 'Over The Rainbow' sung and played in the film.
It is certainly adventurous, but bloated and over-the-top. Kidman is actually better here than in her last few performances ('The Golden Compass', 'Margot at the Wedding', 'The Invasion), but Jackman is mere eye candy. Glad to see most of Australia's finest actors (Brown, Wenham, David Gulpilil, Jack Thompson, and David Ngoombujarra) working in the same film. Is it boring? No. Is it worth seeing? Probably, but it depends if you have time.


Comments: (11)
Add a comment
By: patricia on 11/27/2008 6:47AM
i'll see this film...having been to oz twice, i have fallen in love with its rich history..i read all i can find on that place...3 hours long?? great!! can't wait!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: BRUNI AND IAN GRIFFITHS on 11/28/2008 3:01PM
i am from puerto rican descent but ian is from australia and we went to see the movie with two other friends michele and anthony and we all fell in love with this movie and learned it's history about the stolen children. but we especially fell in love with the child nullah ( BRANDON WALTERS ) WHO STOLE THE SCENES FROM KIDMAN AND JACKMAN. we loved the movie AUSTRALIA!!!!!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Julie Duell on 11/29/2008 7:00AM
In my view the film "Australia" is just wonderful and I will be amazed if it isn't a huge success world-wide!
It's a film of epic proportions and has several layers. It is pure entertainment, with a clever mix of sensitivity, comedy, drama, and spectacular cinematography.
Some of the truths about the treatment of the aborigines by the white population is addressed (but not laboured) and is mingled with timeless spirituality of the aboriginal people and their connectedness with this incredible land.
It is a long 3 hour film but the last segment is so gripping that it didn't drag at all for us. Don't miss it!!! We're going again! Julie D.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Tom Gebarowski on 12/01/2008 11:14PM
I too just saw Australia and really enjoyed it.
In an era of really quirky or violently cynical
films, this one was an old fashioned romantic,
western-style epic. Kidman and Jackman acted well with
great chemistry, will they get Oscar nods?!? I think
Jackman is an Ausie who has been great for yrs as a
leading man, but was always in the shadows of more
popular country mates Mel Gibson & Russel Crowe.
Finally, the grand landscape cinematography and mystical Aborigine subplot really made this film
refreshing and unique. Can you say Oscar-worthy?!?
That kid especially was a hell of an actor!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Anne Morin on 12/10/2008 1:03PM
We went to "Australia" with British firends. We all,men included, loved the film. Nullah, of course was the scene stealer. And adorable boy we hope to see more. Chemistry between Kidman and Jackson was very evident. Good movie, good acting, Oscar nomination, perhaps. Take Kleenex.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Chris Davies on 12/16/2008 8:12PM
I agree with most of the review. The first 60 seconds of the film is incredible and creates an expectation that we are in for a treat. However, the next 30 minutes or so is pure comic book and should be cut from the film (for a "Director's Cut" maybe?) - a case where less is definitely more. After that what unfolds is a great yarn of a story. Baz Luhrmann both wrote the story and directed the film. He is obviously very talented in both areas. I liked the "Wizard of Oz" parallels, the salute to "Walkabout", some amazing camera angles and action scenes, etc. But the film needs a re-edit. Most of the acting was very good, particularly that of David Wenham who convincingly plays one of the nastiest characters I have seen on film in a long time. I agree that Nicole Kidman's performance is surprisingly good. Overall, the film is both entertaining and historically relevant. The whole family will enjoy this film.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Ross Muir on 12/20/2008 8:19AM
I thought "Australia" was a great film. It's one of the few films that I would go back to watch again. There's something for everyone: the reconciliation theme, an historical context, great cinematography and just a good ripping yarn which make the 3 hours go quickly.
I suspect that those who ultimately decide these things - the people who pay their hard earned money to go to the movies - will love this film. I think it will prove a very popular film because it's right for its time.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: MarianK on 12/20/2008 7:00PM
I'm Australian and had no intention of going to see this, thinking it would be a mess of all the usual outback Ozzie cliches about 'let's all be boys in the bush together'. Luckily I had a change of heart when a friend strongly recommended it to me. Yes, all the old outback Ozzie cliches are there but they have been so transformed by a combination of 1930s bush romanticism and contemporary social criticism that it worked for me on every level. Luhrmann is a unique talent ... and a brave one for making a film like this in an industry so dominated by violence, misogyny and cynicism.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Monty Cross on 1/03/2009 8:16PM
I'm Australian and I was impressed also. Luhrmann: you're not bad mate, and you seem to be able to represent Australia better than I though Hollywood could. A few negatives to stir the pot:
1) It'll never be as original and Australian as "Man from Snowy River".
2)Too much Wizard of Oz music (It's not Australian!). Too little Australian music.
3)Didn't flow well. You tried to capture too many themes at the same time in disjointed fashion. For such a simple plot, it required more concentration than should be necessary to follow.
Nevertheless, it left a great impression and I'm happy you let Aussie English run free.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: jmpadelfor@aol.com on 1/10/2009 9:21AM
I saw Australia and I thought it was one of the best movies I have seen in a long time. I thought the acting was great, and there is usually a lot of comedy in real life and I thought it was done well. I will buy the DVD when it comes out, and I may go and see the movie again.
Reply to this Comment | Report This